Hang out .. .. .

In silence long enough and you might just download universal truth.  ..... Filtered through your pineal gland of course.

I I ?

I

"Can You Handle the Truth?"

Alah ya insist on talking about God!

Is it Clockwork Orange? Sunrise? Sunset? Beat - oven?

Heaven forbid anyone wants to discuss any concepts about life/death/time/purpose more substantiated in spiritual logic than the theologian painted pictures that institutions have provided.

Heaven forbid one is to express "eunich" (pronouced unique) views on such things, s/he'd be castrated.

Conformity conformity.  If it doesn't fit in the box, they "Giver" problems.

Imagine an earth where people weren't scared of "death?"  Imagine all the emotions and thinking etc. that would change?  Would there be fear?  Would there be sadness?  How would sense of purpose be affected?  Attachments to love?  What would life in general be like?

Imagine an earth where there was no such thing as "death."  You lived for eternity; many eternal lifetimes over and over again.  What are implicit issues created if this construct were instilled in us from birth?  Groundhog's Day # 823790.

How do you pendulamize the metronome swing such that you can break through the created construct of death yet not get pulled into "timeless insanity?"

You see. . . . .there are many ways to go about discussing the spiritual realms which are much more rooted in logic than current language.  Spiritual talk is very airy, loose, an inability to fully grasp.  Practice your koans.  Practice your "Ohms."

Then there is religion:  the Koran, Bible, Baghavagita etc. These are all concepts that make complete logical sense yet they don't make any logical sense in our logical worlds of making sense.

Therefore, take the fractal-phored (metaphor based on fractals) concept of religion and apply it to your thinking of life and death.  Use logical components of thinking, machines, movies, songs etc. etc. Pick and choose the conceptual cards you want to incorporate and reshuffle the deck into your own sense making.

Allow the spiritual cards to settle in a way that makes logical sense using "logic" of teaching, but that doesn't make "sense/cents" if you were to go around talking about such things as they would not be MASSly accepted by this earth's/culture's conditioning and context/milieu of our created rational system.  This fractalized concept is how religion operates. 3.14us?

Anyway.....
The aspect that is important for you to remember is to make sure you have a cord that connects the logical reshuffled spiritual building constructed by you to explain life and death to the already existing accepted buildings of logic such that, unlike religions, there are no conflicts of logic and the ambiguity is removed.

ONLY FOR THOSE REALLY EVOLVED . .. . .

Try learning from the spiruital, life, death messages your children have for you rather than insisting on imprinting them with what you know about "death" Bee C? u ZZZZZZZZ ....You NO nothing.

Anyway, they are closer to the other side than you are by the time you can read and understand these words.

CAVEAT:  If you are not coming to see me for this facet of therapy as linked below, and/or if you are not interested in expanding your spiritual lens, entirely disregard this blog post.  I am more than willing to operate and talk in systemEYEzed boxes with no invitation of these types of concepts.  The way you LIVE is up to  you.  Japanese read kanji right to left. haha.

E-X-P-A-N-D psychic awareness

hmmmmmmmm

padme hum???

Parents!!! Unsleeping "Beau"ty: Re-sCRYPTed stories

"Unsleeping Beauty"

Parents: When you read children storybooks, and/or watch Disney/Pixar  movies,  re-script the endings to invite alternative possibilities. 

Most children's fables and movies are written with a prince type of character rescuing the princess in distress. 

• What type of pressures for both genders do you think are created by this story-line?

• How do you think these story endings affect men's and women's views of each other?

• How do you think these imprinted suggestions may actually manifest the reverse of a 'happily ever after' ending?

Dialogue with children about alternative endings to stories not only decrease internalized gender pressures and decrease role related gender assumptions of other,  but it re-positions placement of ego self with respect to other.

Furthermore, inviting the creation of alternative story endings expands imaginative potential.

"A mind once stretched by the imagination never regains it's original dimensions."

(Biology lens):
An increased imagination results in increased empathy levels due to oxytocin level changes associated with increased mental perspective ability. 

(Spiritual lens):
One possible suggestion for an alternative Sleeping Beauty ending that is more spiritual in nature might sound like: 

"And She lived happily ever after without the prince because her Higher Self, "Miss Unsleeping Beauty" came to awaken and enlighten Sleeping Beauty so she could see and experience the world with "two" clarity. 

From this lens of Eyes Wide Open, as an adult, when Sleeping Beauty doesn't get her "wants" met by Mr. P. 'Rinse', (I mean Tom) she doesn't have to 'wash' her hands of him, nor does she have to flood him with over-demands or drown herself in 'tears' for those unmet. It begins with the Kid - man.

Re-script the stories of perception. Or rec-EYE-cle deception. 

The way you choose your view is really up to you......Imprint it on .. ...You know who. 

Just be careful of the reflect
That it is not something you regret
Or that you want to deflect 

"Mirror mirror on the wall."

www.livin4d.com

www.edginglife.com

If you slip-her Cinderella's broken glass version #2, how might the ending change her view......Yours too!

A-dieu

Adam's Apple: D'core. Word?

What if  for 30 days people were required to engage in all communication with their mouths shut?

I wonder what people could learn about each other and about humanity without all the built in cognitive assumptions that lace every comment and every question and every response  that people aren't even aware of?

I wonder what people's  tolerance threshold in terms of time allowance and willingness of effort to understand each other would be via communication without words in comparison to tolerance and willingness allotted for other accompanying spoken language.

Because...... let me tell you something with my mouth via writing.....

When  communicating with talking mouths and ears, people really don't listen to each other. 

People filter the receipt of spoken and written words through individualized ego, personalized experiences, attenuated focus, rationalized sense making, and through how they want to operate in the world and what is convenient for them. 

They filter spoken language through their created emotions attached to cognitive constructs whether these cognitive constructs are true or not. The associated emotions are very true and perceived as very real. 

So, people pretend to pause time and really listen to others. They  even pretend to themselves.

The reality is that people simply do not listen without inserting their own egos.

There is an inability to create a willing suspension of disbelief of the self such that other can truly be understood  from the world in which they are existing in and which they experience life.

Not out of pernicion, but due to programmed societal intergenerational default and people's overlaid egos on a "mass" level, people are not aware of the threads that have been sewn awry. In fact if there was an awareness of these arrived threads the whole "Tapestry" framework would change King's notes. 

People cannot see in reality...... that the emperpr really is wearing new clothes sewn by the tailors with invisible threads. 

Children are programmed and conditioned to believe and interpret that the emperor was blind. The reality is that it is the children's  eyes that are being sewn shut blinded from truth.

People are blinded to invisibility in which they cannot see and thus they teach their children the same.

"Eat an apple a day," as the expression goes.

Apples don't fall far from the trees in which they grow.

In the Bible, Eve eats the apple.  The Apple symbolizes wisdom and knowledge. Knowledge is shared through words. It is The Word that is flawed. It is words that are poisonous and it is the words that turn situations into 'the Pitts. ' 

The apple of knowledge creates and disconnects people at the core. The apple of knowledge is root of all "Evil".....In reeverse......."Live'. ..   

It is not Eve's fault that she took a bite out of the Apple. This concept is not meant to Blair ....I mean blame women.  Eve took a bite out of Adam's apple.

An Adam's apple is not meant to blame men..... .. an Adam's apple is simpy the voice box that creates the problems.

If Adam has the apple and Eve takes a bite of the Apple...... Even if they are both Macs .... Inevitably there will be communication errors.

Within a 'Mac'  Apple operating base, what is seen on the front end of the screen .....or the presentation of HiSs (hOS) image ...is not the same as what is coded for within the back end of the Mac. 

People will have talking and listening communication errors even if their operating systems are the same and updated.  Transmission of cultural focus with respect to time keeps people's operating systems on testing 'base.' 

I wonder how people's understanding and love for each other would change at the core without the apple?

What if for 30 days, people were only allowed to communicate with each other via body demonstrations of concepts, hand gestures, drawings, eye signalling,  using objects for references Etc?

Without the familiar territory of  "Battleship talk" in which people have their "anchors"of psyche and awareness charted and plotted, their layers of latitude and longitude can evolve into  laisse-tude which is a much more fair course. 

As language currently stands, ..... exchanged word coordinates  result in "sinking/synching " of others' boats. 

Swim away in body. Break free of spoke word. Eh men?

www.edginglife.com

Facebook Golemizers

This statement is not intended to be pesimistic.. ...It is intended to portray a reality learned via people's anecdotal 'shares'.

Many people seem to judge one's entire life, being and character by the sliver seen on Facebook.

Perhaps many are undynamic in nature, thus allowing for an ability to capture the entire "self" on Facebook, resulting in their projection of this 'self' onto others.

Aside from the Facebook wedge of psyche golemizing the entire person. ....

Be careful . . .Censorship of speech is important. The First Amendment and the Free Press Clause do not seem to apply to Facebook.

Save any of life's anger for "therapy" in which your payment ensures your safety to express thoughts (exclusion of Tarasoff Law)

This statement is not a self-plug for business.....Though of.course you are welcomed.

External expression of anger is an important step in one's healing of perceived injustices though in many cultures it is not socially acceptable.

Beating a punching bag and releasing physical anger .... converting cortisol to dopamine is good for the body ....But it does not serve as a drain for the mind.

Also. . .

Don't allow for a therapist to simply move you into any possible "sadness below the anger."

Sometimes, sadness does not exist below the anger. Sometimes, it is not helpful to move into sadness as it can often be associated with acquiescing of someone else's overlaid truth resulting in unnecessary personal disempowerment.

If your story is your truth, hold onto it!

Allow for others to judge, but don't allow for their internal positioning of you externally framed in language to lasso you into their scripts.

www.edginglife.com

Wax on Wax Off.

Caveat:  This writing is an attempt to "semantisize" the aerial and spiritual realms of sorts into words and cognitive ego realities for shared understanding.... . . . which really. . . .is quite difficult, as spiritual concepts transcend human form.  True spiritual concepts transcend language . . . . . .of familiar body, of familiar heart and of familiar mind.   Spiritual knowings transcend cognitive constructs as we have been conditioned to 'trust' them to be.  

Condensing spirituality into words is metaphorically like attempting to solidify water from evaporation.   To use attempted words forces the  restriction of spirituality by putting edges on expansion.  

So ....anyway......nail me to the cross of mental judgment if that's what you want to do with respect to my attempted conveyance.  It seems the Last Judgement is far from the last.

Though of course I suppose, being in human form, it feels much better to "the self" to have a choice of whether or not to choose to do various behaviors that are laced with heart love, (for self and/or other), it is still a good spiritual practice to practice the meditational art of  just-

"the doing" 

of various behaviors and tasks even without the heart love. Often, tasks that are laced or filled with heart love .. . . .invite the defrilling and/or deflation or ego swell reaction in any which way to the recognized change in state of love attachment or response judgement from self and/or other.

I don't mean to suggest practicing of various tasks or "the doing" to help move one's self out of heart anger. Nor do Isuggest doing various tasks to move from an inverse love place to a love place.

I simply mean practicing the art of "the doing" from a neutral space, a neutral feeling, a neutral ego.  Perhaps there are times in life when one doesn't have the option to feel heart love with respect to the doing of any particular behavior.  (When I write heart love, I don't just mean in the romance department, but in all categories of relationships).

There is a Tipping Point of ego when one cares for "the self" and when one cares for other.  

 

• Sometimes, choices benefit both self and other. 
• Sometimes choices hurt self and other. 
• Sometimes the energy flow associated with choice is neutral to self and positive to other.
• Sometimes the energy flow associated with choice is neutral to other and positive to self.
• Sometimes choices benefit self at the cost of other. 
• Sometimes choices benefit other at the cost of self.

With presence and connection, one has awareness as to the current directions of energy impacts. Movement in any one of the above directions is based on ego perspective of the self. Within interpersonal dynamics, there are two or more "selves."

When ego is not involved in any direction, as the heart is not laced with love of self and or laced with love of other other, there becomes practice of "the doing."

"The doing" is the utilitarian philosophy of meditational practice. "Wax on wax off. Wax on wax off. Wax on wax off."

The practice of "the doing" is just that......it's a practice.  The practice of doing is just like the practice of NOT doing. It's about balance. Identifying the Tipping Point of balance is important. Probably almost everything in life has a Tipping Point.  Malcom Gladwell writes about this concept.

The non-egoic practice of doing or not doing simply comes down to a choice with respect to time. 

When there is no rush . . . when there is no busy, no  attainment for more and better and more. When there is no attachment to Prada or Gucci or Tesla .  . .When primary needs of the self are met such as food and shelter and when there is no attachment to Ego recognition, whether it be acknowledgment by other of acts performed for other . .   Or acknowledgement by other for acts performed . . . many things lose the familiar sense of purpose as the conditioned ego once knew them to be. Many acts lose purpose of the heart as the heart once knew them to feel.

In this space of being, doing and receiving without the relation of ego to other's ego,  whether it be in judgement of kudos, or judgment of construction, or judgement of bettering ..... a very different awareness is experienced. 

By default, this neutral space of unattached ego allows for the mirrored reflect of others' judgement from all directions. (withered/whethered veins/vains?)

This neutral space not only allows for mirrored reflection, but it allows for visibility of others' egoic blueprints for their constructions of language, behaviors, intentions. 

This neutral space opens awareness of other's ego orientation with respect to the direct topic of interchange as well as opens awareness with respect to orientating layers and layers beyond the language and behaviors of direct interchange.

This ego neutral space removes tears away from the peeling layers of onion. Without tears of "fall or collect," one experiences  all the layers of others' onions as they are not masked by personal ego filtering.

Imagine a coloring book with connect the dot pictures to be revealed upon connecting the proper dots.  Now imagine not having to spend the time connecting the linear dots in order to see the picture.  Imagine the dots of the picture just illuminating all at once, peeling away from the matrix of surrounding dots without having to "connect the dots."  Even imagine many pictures peeling away from the matrix all at once, some of the pictures overlapping, some of them not.  

Without the filtering through self ego from a reward or loss perspective, conditioned truth of other's ego becomes quite clear.  When/if this happens, it's not about judging and or condemning other's ego build, though some buildings of ego might seem quite funny.  It's not about teaching them a lesson unless they invite a teaching.  This clear visibility allows for one's ability to navigate and be with shared other in a space all knowing.  Of course, this all knowing space doesn't mean the other person in the interchange will experience the dynamic in the same way.  So, while connected to universal truth and far from alone, in the human conditioned form at times, it can feel ....well.......sometimes lonely, sometimes arrogant, sometimes sad, sometimes interesting, sometimes a chuckle of humanity.

When the onion tears peel away, ego construction is visible and conditioned humanity is experienced, the dots can no longer be connected in the same linear ways which were once familiar.  One is not lost in the world.  It's not like Hansel and Grettle's story when they lose their way because the birds ate the breaded trail to get home.  There is no direction to get to.  There is no destination.  The illuminated pictures of visibility allow for aerial view of the world and people within, thus the 'path to home' is no longer about connecting the dots.

Along with this 4 dimensional experience of life and true visibility beyond human ego constructs, as previously mentioned, one's relationship to love of self and love of other transforms.  There becomes a new way of relating as it is clear that the emotions experienced and perceived are just the result of filling in the blueprint constructs of cognitive buildings.  

Without the blueprint constructs of human form, we are all connected love on the other side of body.  This knowing allows for the transcendence of ego attachment to positive gains and/or ego attempt to avoid negative gains.  With respect to love, one no longer identifies self to other and/or other to self from the egoic mind.  So, it is almost as if one is looking in on humanity including looking in on the self from the Sylvia Browne's angle of view.....from "The Other Side."  In psychological pathologizing terminology, this could be looked at as dissociation or possibly depolarization, though in the spiritual realm, it is not this at all.  

Don't get me wrong, there is a certain missing and longing for the old self, the old love in which the conditioned ego was once familiar.

I guess one could reference this concept as ego death, spiritual connect, transcendence of self, or something of the sort.  I guess it is up to The Interpreter, and his cognitive constructs, how he wishes to categorize and make sense of the thoughts I'm attempting to convey. 

Various religions reference this concept in different ways. The Hindus for example, have words such as Atman and Brahman. 

In revisiting the concept of "the doing," the concept of the "wax on wax off" practice, without ego love of self (and/or other), it doesn't mean that one is lacking in "love of self." The concept doesn't suggest that one has self hatred and/or needs to practice more loving of the self.  The doing for the sake of doing . . .. is just that. . . .it is doing. "The doing" as a choice to enjoy the fill of time or meditationally practice the fill of time is a very different experience from "the doing" with a directional focus and/or ego attachment to outcome.

When there truly is no differentiation between self and other in terms of worth, value and love due to the deconstruction of blueprints and illumination of true clarity .... When one truly has no need for ego gratification or prevention of ego destruction, and one has no attachment to the acquiescing of   building a life in any goal oriented direction other than experiencing what is in the now, one's relationship to the concepts of "the doing" and to love changes.

I'm not sure if this concept of waxing on and waxing off is something that can be practiced in order to be attained or if by default of human experiences, it just happens. And......I'm not sure if the wax on wax off concept is something that someone would want to attain . . ..  even though many people practice striving for it. 

Afterall, we choose to be in individual human form on this side of life . . . . to experience life on this side of life . . . .partly to have ego experiences and ego shared experiences  . . . .of egoic thought, of egoic emotion, of egoic touch, of egoic feeling of heart, of egoic memory, of egoic manifest.  All these aspects of human relation take years of building, conditioning and imprinting.  I'm not sure we are meant to experience the other side while on this side . . ..but for those who do.......well.......perhaps the change of "the course"

changes the relationship to "the curse" ....or egoic attached love....affecting choices of "the doing" of everything in the matrix.

Scripted thoughts

EDGING LIFE

Hey Honey.

"Dick" & "Pussy"

Why is it that in American culture we use human genitalia as derogatory condescending and punishing terms.

Dick definition: to be an a******. To be a mean bad person.

Pussy definition: to be wimpy, weak, lacking in strength.

So creative Americans... my 'hands' (man-os) off to you.

'Mer-de' see?
(French)
(Spanish)
(English)

"Jesus".....Honestly!
(En espanol.....Hey Seuss)